diff options
author | Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> | 2017-11-01 22:17:36 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> | 2017-11-01 22:17:36 +0100 |
commit | 1e8ba161bb1c4c3b42fef08072b371a9907431b7 (patch) | |
tree | a25febd0b48978df9e5814afe0d9564c45e6031d /2017 | |
parent | 788c1e42d9ce280703a69ebdd110ea2dfae168fc (diff) |
Add current version of ttcn3 slides for netdev 2.2
Diffstat (limited to '2017')
-rw-r--r-- | 2017/ttcn-netdev2.2/ttcn3.adoc | 521 |
1 files changed, 521 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2017/ttcn-netdev2.2/ttcn3.adoc b/2017/ttcn-netdev2.2/ttcn3.adoc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3fd78c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/2017/ttcn-netdev2.2/ttcn3.adoc @@ -0,0 +1,521 @@ +TTCN-3 and Eclipse TITAN for testing protocol stacks +==================================================== +:author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> +:copyright: 2017 by Harald Welte (License: CC-BY-SA) +:backend: slidy +:max-width: 45em + +== Protocol Testing + +Important for: + +* conformance to specification +* ensuring interoperability +* network security +* regression testing +* performance + +== Protocol Testing + +No standard methodology, language, approach, tool + +* testing implementation against itself +** works only for symmetric protocols +** wouldn't cover lots of problems +* testing against wireshark +** wireshark often way more tolerant than spec +* custom implementation +** in Python (e.g. using scapy) +** in Erlang (good binary encoder/decoder) or other languages +* specific tools like packetdrill + +== Protocol Testing + +Personal story: During past years, + +* I implemented tons of [telecom] protocols / stacks at Osmocom.org +* I was looking for better tools to help [automatic] testing +** primarily functional testing (correctness / conformance) +** not so much performance testing +* I figured Ideal test tool would... +** allow very productive and expressive way to describe encoding/decoding +** allow very convenient pattern matching on incoming messages +** allow exchange of messages asynchronously with implementation under test +* I stumbled on TTCN-3 occasionally and investigated + +== The TTCN-3 Language + +* domain-specific language *just* for protocol conformance tests +* TTCN history back to 1983 (!), TTCN-3 since 2000 +* used extensively in classic telecom sector (Ericsson, Nokia, etc.) +* ETSI developed and published abstract test suites in TTCN-3 for +** IPv6, SIP, DIAMETER, ePassports, Digital Mobiel Radio, 6LoWPAN +* Other bodies published test suites for +** CoAP, MQTT, MOST, AUTOSAR + +But: Until 2015, only proprietary tools / compilers :( + +== Eclipse TITAN + +* After TTCN-3 specification in 2000, Ericsson internally develops TTCN-3 toolchain +* adopted for many Ericsson-internal testing of all kinds of products +* proprietary software with commercial licenses +* 300,000 lines of Java + 1.6 Million lines of C++ +* Released as Open Source as "Eclipse TITAN" in 2015 +** Not just TTCN-3 compiler, but also extensive documentations and many protocol modules, test ports as well as Eclipse IDE, Log file viewer/visualizer, etc. +* `eclipse-titan` part of standard Debian / Ubuntu archive, only one apt-get away + +Great, we can finally use TTCN-3 in FOSS! + +== Eclipse TITAN compiler workflow + +[graphviz] +---- +digraph G { + progra [label="Human Developer"]; + ttcn3 [label="TTCN-3 source (ATS)"]; + cpp [label="Generated C++ source"]; + exec [label="Binary Executable (ETS)"]; + tps [label="Other C++ sources, as needed"]; + progra -> ttcn3 [label="writes code"]; + ttcn3 -> cpp [label="ttcn3_compiler"]; + cpp -> exec [label="GNU gcc / g++"]; + tps -> cpp +} +---- + +* TITAN actually _compiles_ into executable binaries, it is not using a VM or scripting +** ATS: Abstract Test Suite (source code) +** ETS: Executable Test Suite (executable code) + +== TTCN-3 Language Features (with TITAN) + +* comprehensive type system +* parametric templates +* variety of encoders/decoders +* automatic / comprehensive logging framework +* powerful program control statements +* built-in notion of tests cases, test suites, verdicts, ... +* runtime / executor for parallel test components + aggregating results + +== TTCN-3 Basic Types + +* Simple basic types such as `integer`, `float`, `boolen` +* Basic string types such as `bitstring`, `octetstring`, `hexstring`, `charstring` (IA5) and `universal charstring` (UCS-4). +* Structured Types `record`, `set`, `record of`, `set of` +* Verdict type `verdicttype` +** can have either value `none`, `pass`, `inconc`, `fail`, or `error` +** verdict can only _deteriorate_ (`pass` -> `fail`) but never improve (`error` -> `pass`) +** every test case implicitly has a verdict, no need to explicitly declare a variable of `verdicttype` + +== TTCN-3 Structured Types + +A structured type is an abstract type comprised of other types, whcih can be nested. +An example for a `record` type (similar to a C-language `struct`) is shown below + +-------- +type record MyMessageType { + integer field1 optional<1>, + charstring field2, + boolean field3 +}; +-------- +<1> optional members may be present or not + +== TTCN-3 Union Type + +A union expresses a set of alternative types of which one alternative must be chosen. + +-------- +type union MyMessageUnion { + integer field1, + charstring field2, +}; +-------- + +Difference to C-language union: `ischosen()` can be used to learn which of the union members is +chosen/defined! + + +== Not-used and omit + +* until a variable or field of structured type is assigned, it is _unbound_ +* whenever a _value_ is expected, TTCN-3 runtime will create an error for _unbound_ +* in case of absence of optional fields, explicit `omit` value must be assigned! + +== Sub-typing + +Sub-typing can be used to further constrain a given type. Typical examples include constrained number ranges, +and string patterns + +-------- +type integer MyIntRange (1..100); +type integer MyIntRange8 (0..infinity); +type charstring MyCharRange (”k”..”w"); +type charstring SideType (”left”, ”right”); +type integer MyIntListRange (1..5,7,9); +type record length(0..10) of integer RecOfInt; +type charstring CrLfTermStrin (pattern ”*\r\n”); +-------- + +== Templates + +* Matching incoming messages against some kind of specification is one of the most common tasks in testing protocols +** some expected fields are static (message type) +** some expected fields are known (source address) +** some fields are chosen by sender (some identifier) +** some fields we don't care (optional headers that may or may not be present) +* TTCN-3 Templates provide elegant solution for this, avoiding any explicit code to be written +** templates can even be parametric, i.e. they can be instantiated with "arguments" +* templates can also be used for sending messages, if they are fully specified/qualified + +== Templates + +-------- +// Value list template +template charstring tr_SingleABorC := (”A”, ”B”, ”C”); +-------- + +-------- +// Value range +template float tr_NearPi := (3.14 .. 3.15); +template integer tr_FitsToOneByte := (0 .. 255); +template integer tr_GreaterThanZero := (1 .. infinity); +-------- + +-------- +// Intermixed value list and range matching +template integer tr_Intermixed := ((0..127), 200, 255); +-------- + +== Matching inside values + +-------- +// Using any element matching inside a bitstring value +// Last 2 bits can be '0' or '1' +template bitstring tr_AnyBSValue := ’101101??’B; +-------- + +-------- +// Matches charstrings with the first character "a" +// and the last one "z" +template charstring tr_0 := pattern "a*z"; +-------- + +* more capabilities using `complement`, `ifpresent`, `subset`, `superset`, `permutation` constructs not + covered here + + +== Parametric Templates + +See below for an example of a parametric template: + +-------- +type record MyMessageType { + integer field1 optional, + charstring field2, + boolean field3 +}; + +template MyMessageType trMyTemplte(boolean pl_param) := { + field1 : = ?, // present, but any value + field2 : = (”B”, ”O”, ”Q”) , + field3 := pl_param +}; +-------- + +The built-in `match()` function can be used to check if a given value matches a given template. Some TTCN-3 +statements such as `receive()` have built-in capabilities for template matching, avoiding even the explicit +call of `match()` in many cases. + +== Template Hierarchy + +Using modified templates, one can build a hierarchy of templates: From the specific to the unspecific + +---- +template MyMsgType t_MyMsgAny := { + msg_type := ?, + foo := bar +}; + +template MyMsgType t_MyMsg23 modifies t_MyMsgAny := { + msg_type := 23, +}; +---- +where + +* _t_MyMsgAny_ matches a message with any message type and "foo=bar", while +* _t_MMyMsg23_ matches only those that have "foo=bar" and "msg_type=23" + +== Encoders/Decoders + +* type system, templates, matching are all nice and great, but we need to get data from wire format into + TTCN-3 abstract types +* TTTCN-3 specifies importing of formal schema definitios, such as ASN.1, IDL, XSD (XML) and JSON +* TITAN has additional codecs for those (many) protocols that lack formal syntax +** `raw` codec for binary protocols (e.g. GTP) +** `text` codec for text based protocols (e.g. HTTP, MGCP, IMAP, ...) +* codecs allow you to _express/describe_ the format (declarative programming) rather than the usual imperative approach + +== TITAN raw codec: UDP Example + +How to express an UDP header using TITAN raw codec + +-------- +type integer LIN2_BO_LAST (0..65535) with { + variant ”FIELDLENGTH(16), COMP(nosign), BYTEORDER(last)” +}; +type record UDP_header { + LIN2_BO_LAST srcport, + LIN2_BO_LAST dstport, + LIN2_BO_LAST len, + LIN2_BO_LAST cksum +} with { variant ”FIELDORDER(msb)” }; +type record UDP packet { + UDP_header header + octetstring payload +} with { + variant (header) ”LENGTHTO(header, payload), LENGTHINDEX(len)” +}; +-------- + +== TITAN raw codec: GTP Example + +How to express an GTP header using TITAN raw codec + +-------- +type record GRE_Header { + BIT1 csum_present, + BIT1 rt_present, + BIT1 key_present, + ... + OCT2 protocol_type, + OCT2 checksum optional, + OCT2 offset optional, + OCT4 key otional, + ... +} with { + variant (checksum) "PRESENCE(csum_present='1', rt_present='1'B)" + variant (offset) "PRESENCE(csum_present='1'B, rt_present='1'B)" + variant (key) "PRESENCE(key_present='1'B)" +} +-------- + + +== TITAN text codec: MGCP Example + +-------- +type charstring MgcpVerb ("EPCF", "CRCX", "MDCX", "DLCX", "RQNT", "NTFY", + "AUEP", "AUCX", "RSIP") with { + variant "TEXT_CODING(,convert=upper_case,,case_insensitive)" +}; +type charstring MgcpTransId (pattern "\d#(1,9)"); +type charstring MgcpEndpoint (pattern "*@*"); +type charstring MgcpVersion (pattern "\d.\d") with { + variant "BEGIN('MGCP ')" +}; +type record MgcpCommandLine { + MgcpVerb verb, + MgcpTransId trans_id, + MgcpEndpoint ep, + MgcpVersion ver +} with { + variant "SEPARATOR(' ', '[\t ]+')" + variant "END('\r\n', '([\r\n])|(\r\n)')" +}; +-------- + +== Program Control Statements + +* `if` / `else` like in C +* `select` statement similar to C `switch` +* `for`, `while`, `do-while` loops like in C +* `goto` and `label` +* `break` and `continue` like in C + +== Abstract Communications Operations + +* TTCN-3 test suites communicate with _implementation under test_ through abstract TestPorts +** TestPorts can be implemented in TTCN-3 or C++ and linked in +** TestPorts must be _connected_ before using send/receive operaitons +** TITAN provides TestPorts for e.g. packet socket, IP/UDP/TCP/SCTP socket, ... +* `<port>.send(<ValueRef>)` performs non-blocking send +** Literal value, constant, variable, specific value template, ... +* `<port>.receive(<TemplateRef>)` or `<port>.receive` performs blocking receive +** literal value, constant, variable, template (with matching!), inline template + +'... but if receive blocks, how can we wait for any of N events? + +== Program Control and Behavior + +* program statements are executed in order +* blocking statements block the execution of the component +* occurrence of unexpected event may cause infinite blocking + +---- +// x must be the first on queue P, y the second +P.receive(x); // Blocks until x appears on top of queue P +P.receive(y); // Blocks until y appears on top of queue P +// When y arrives first then P.receive(x) blocks -> error +---- + +This is what leads to the `alt` statement: +`alt` declares a seto alternatives covering all events, which + +* can happen: expected messages, timeouts, ... +* must not happen: unexpected faulty messages, no message received, ... +* all alternatives inside `alt` are blocking operations + +== The `alt` statement + +---- +P.send(req) +T.start; +// ... +alt { +[] P.receive(resp) { /* actions to do and exit alt */ } +[] any port.receive { /* handle unexpected event */ } +[] T.timeout { /* handle timer expiry and exit */ } +} +---- + +* [] is guard condition enables or disables the alternative +** usually empty `[]` equals `[true]` +** can contain a condition like `[x > 0]` +** very good for e.g. state machines to activate some alternatives only in certain states while others may +occur in any state + + +== The `alt` and `repeat` statements + +The `repeat` statement + +* takes a new snapshot and re-evaluates the alt statement +* can appear as last statement in statement blocks of statements + +---- +P.send(req) +T.start; +alt { + [] P.receive(resp) { /* actions to do and exit alt */ } + [] P.receive(keep_alive) { /* handle keep alive message */ + repeat } + [] any port.receive { /* handle unexpected event */ } + [] T.timeout { /* handle timer expiry and exit */ } +} +---- + +== TTCN-3 modules + +TTCN-3 code is written in _modules_ + +* a test suite consists of one or more modules +* a module contains _module definitions_ and an optional _control part_ +** _parameters_ (automatically configurable via config file) +** definition of _data types_, _constants_, _templates_ +** definition of _communications ports_ +** definition of _test components_, _functions_ _altstesp_ and _test cases_ +** _control part_ determines default order/execution of test cases +* modules can import from each other (think in python terms) + +== Examples + +Let's have a look at some real-world examples and do a bit of a walk-through +before continuing with the slides... + +== Logging + +* TITAN runtime contains extensive logging framework +* config file determines log level for various different subsystems +** e.g. any encode, decode, receive, transmit operations logged +** timer starts, expirations +** any changes to test case verdict +* explicit logging from code by use of `log()` built-in function +* `ttcn3_logformat` tool for pretty-printing log files +* `ttcn3_logmerge` tool for merging/splicing multiple logs +* log plugins e.g. for generating JUnit-XML available +** facilitates easy reporting / integration to Jenkins or other CI + +== Logging + +Log file format example: + +---- +// abstract data type before encode +13:30:41.243536 Sent on GTPC to system @GTP_CodecPort.Gtp1cUnitdata : { peer := { connId := 1, remName := "127.0.23.1", remPort := 2123 }, gtpc := { pn_bit := '0'B, s_bit := '1'B, e_bit := '0'B, spare := '0'B, pt := '1'B, version := '001'B, messageType := '01'O, lengthf := 0, teid := '00000000'O, opt_part := { sequenceNumber := '3AAC'O, npduNumber := '00'O, nextExtHeader := '00'O, gTPC_extensionHeader_List := omit }, gtpc_pdu := { echoRequest := { private_extension_gtpc := omit } } } } + +// 'msg' contains encoded binary data actually sent via socket +13:30:41.243799 Outgoing message was mapped to @IPL4asp_Types.ASP_SendTo : { connId := 1, remName := "127.0.23.1", remPort := 2123, proto := { udp := { } }, msg := '32010004000000003AAC0000'O } +---- + +== Logging + +The same log file lines if run through `ttcn3_logformat` + +---- +13:30:41.243536 Sent on GTPC to system @GTP_CodecPort.Gtp1cUnitdata : { + peer := { + connId := 1, + remName := "127.0.23.1", + remPort := 2123 + }, + gtpc := { + pn_bit := '0'B, + s_bit := '1'B, + e_bit := '0'B, + spare := '0'B, + pt := '1'B, + version := '001'B, + messageType := '01'O, + lengthf := 0, + teid := '00000000'O, + opt_part := { + sequenceNumber := '3AAC'O, + npduNumber := '00'O, + nextExtHeader := '00'O, + gTPC_extensionHeader_List := omit + }, + gtpc_pdu := { + echoRequest := { + private_extension_gtpc := omit + } + } + } +} +13:30:41.243799 Outgoing message was mapped to @IPL4asp_Types.ASP_SendTo : { + connId := 1, + remName := "127.0.23.1", + remPort := 2123, + proto := { + udp := { } + }, + msg := '32010004000000003AAC0000'O +} +---- + + +== Existing TITAN Source + +* Protocol encoding/decoding +** BSSAP+, BSSGP, BSSMAP, CoAP, DSS1, DUA, EAP, GRE, GTP, HTTP, ISUP, LLC, M2PA, M2UA, MQTT, MongoDB, NDP, NS, + NTAF, ROSE, SCTP, SDP, SNDCP, STOMP, STUN, SUA, TLS, WTP, DNS, IP, SMPP, SNMP, IKEv2, DHCP, PPP, RTP, TCP, + UDP, XMPP, DHCPv6, SMTP, ICMP, RTSP, ICMPv6, DIAMETER, FrameRelay, ProtoBuff, IUA, L2TP, M3UA, MIME, + WebSocket, H.248, IMAP, IPsec, SRTP, MSRP, ICAP, RADIUS +* Protocol Emulation +** M3UA, SCCP, SUA +* Test Ports +** GPIO, MTP3, Serial, SocketCAN, SCTP, SIP, HTTP, Telnet, UDP, pcap file, pipe, SQL, TCP, SUNRPC, SSH, STDINOUT, sockets, LDAP + + +== Further Reading + +* Ericsson TTCN-3 tutorial http://www.ttcn-3.org/files/TTCN3_P.pdf +* An Introduction to TTCN-3, 2nd Edition <http://www.wiley.com/go/willcock_TTCN-3_2e> +* Modules https://github.com/eclipse +* More Modules http://git.eclipse.org/ +* Debian https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=eclipse-titan +* Ubuntu https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=eclipse-titan + +== EOF + +End of File |