summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2017
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHarald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>2017-04-19 13:25:40 +0200
committerHarald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>2017-04-19 13:25:40 +0200
commit3a79e9e2c5315a8a91b34ddb206fae4ed59893aa (patch)
tree6c3ea2a6819a82826cdf5df684371763a00becad /2017
parent15736b244211f6b4a43713465b9a6af303aa0715 (diff)
osmocon2017 roadmap
Diffstat (limited to '2017')
-rw-r--r--2017/roadmap-osmocon2017/roadmap.adoc192
1 files changed, 192 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2017/roadmap-osmocon2017/roadmap.adoc b/2017/roadmap-osmocon2017/roadmap.adoc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..583f6bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2017/roadmap-osmocon2017/roadmap.adoc
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+Osmocom Callular Infrastructure Roadmap
+=======================================
+:author: Harald Welte
+:copyright: Harald Welte (License: CC-BY-SA)
+:backend: slidy
+:max-width: 45em
+
+== Disclaimer
+
+People like Dieter, Holger, Daniel and I have invested lots of our
+spare time in the early years. So funding for that came from other
+paid work, and Osmocom projects were a hobby. It was a lot of fun, but
+it's not a sustainable basis for the scope of the projects at this
+time.
+
+Today, our development is driven by
+
+* what people contribute patches for, and/or
+* what companies and consultants in the project get development
+ contracts for (e.g. sysmocom customers)
+
+This means in general that *very little will happen, unless somebody
+commits to putting resources at it!*
+
+
+== Major Roadmap Areas
+
+* Splitting up the NITB
+* Code Quality
+* Testing
+* Integration between 2G and 3G
+* External Interfaces
+
+
+== OsmoNITB
+
+* has been at the heart of most Osmocom based cellular networks
+* is generally doing a good job, but suffers from some issues
+* NITB includes BSC, but BSC code also used to build OsmoBSC
+** No way to test OsmoBSC without a proprietary MSC :(
+* NITB includes sqlite3 based HLR
+** synchronous/blocking access from single-threaded OsmoNITB
+** sqlite3 (particularly via DBI) scalability issues
+
+== RIP NITB; Long Live OsmoMSC
+
+* New *OsmoMSC = OsmoNITB - BSC - HLR*
+* New OsmoHLR (GSUP interface only)
+* 3GPP A-over-IP for OsmoBSC + OsmoMSC
+** New SCCP+M3UA stack, libosmo-sigtran
+* M3UA based IuCS/IuPS in HNB-GW, MSC, SGSN
+** used to be SUA, as it was simpler initially
+* Single code base/branch for 2G and 3G
+
+-> typical 2G setup will become *OsmoBSC + OsmoMSC + OsmoHLR*
+
+== OsmoSTP
+
+Signal Transfer Point, part of libosmo-sccp
+
+* M3UA + SUA support
+* Connectionless and Conenction Oriented SCCP
+* Used primarily for RAN-CN interface (A, Iu) so far
+
+
+== osmo_fsm + osmo_prim
+
+osmo_fsm:: structured approach to state machines
+
+osmo_prim:: structured approach towards primitives at SAP between layers
+
+== osmo_fsm
+
+Generalized finite state machine (FSM) abstraction
+
+* pure C language, no pre-processor / code-generator
+* description of states, permitted events in a state, permitted
+ output states
+* buit-in timer support. Default action on expiry: Destroy FSM
+* parent/children relationship, allows hierarchy of FSMs
+
+Much more maintainable and deterministic than the many implicit or
+non-existing state machines in older code
+
+== osmo_fsm so far
+
+* Ericsson OM2000 managed objects
+* Connection-Oriented SCCP
+* M3UA/SUA ASP + AS state machine
+* All VLR FSMs (LU, Auth, ...) in OsmoMSC
+* AMR DTX in OsmoBTS
+
+== osmo_fsm candidates
+
+* LAPD + LAPDm code
+* A-bis OML managed objects
+* GSM Call Control (maybe even CAMEL-like FSMs?)
+
+More osmo_fsm Would greatly improve code quality, testability and
+maintainability
+
+* but who wants to invest in that? Any volunteers?
+
+== Testing
+
+* unit test coverage of most code is poor, needs attention
+** coverage of new code much better than old code
+* osmo_fsm state introspection via CTRL enables better testing
+* end-to-end system testing software: *osmo-gsm-tester*
+
+== osmo-gsm-tester
+
+* python language for managing BTSs + Modems
+** supports different BTS models
+** can execute suites of test cases on each software version for all BTS models
+* RF cabling between BTSs and Modems to avoid RF interference
+
+-> GOAL: Daily functional testing on all supported platforms/configs
+
+== osmo-gsm-tester
+
+* core python infrastructure working
+* jenkins integration for testing new builds working
+* modem hardware being replaced due to poor ofono support for SL8082
+
+TODO:
+
+* modem integration using better supported hardware
+* more actual test cases beyond SMS + LU
+* 3G support
+
+== External Interfaces
+
+* *VTY* is a human interface, not intended for consumption by software
+** text output syntax not guaranteed stable
+** inefficient
+** commands get added during development to help developers
+
+* *CTRL* interface is the programmatic interface
+** but developers don't need it during development
+** all commands so far added due to user request/requirement
+*** let us know what you need exposed!
+** only way to fundamentally change this is to automatically export things without extra effort
+
+=> Roadmap is to put more effort into CTRL completeness
+
+== Grand Unified Config Theory
+
+Big Wishlist item:
+
+* Unified configuration store / MIB with
+** automatic VTY printer/parser generation
+** automatic CTRL interface exposure
+** telnet/VTY process + MIB daemon outside actual applications
+
+But who will fund this / put resources at it?
+
+== Integration between 2G and 3G
+
+* so far, 2G and 3G live separate to each other
+* we want integration
+** cross-advertisement of neighbor cells
+** inter-RAT mobility
+** inter-RAT hand-over
+* combined PS + CS attach
+* SMS over packet switched
+
+== Operation / Maintenance
+
+* generation of Alarms in BTS + PCU (done)
+* report via CTRL TRAP as well as A-bis OML (done)
+* centralized reporting / collections of Alarms (tbd)
+
+-> we need to generate more alarms in abnormal situations
+
+* generation of more stat, counters / KPIs
+** lots of work spent in 2016 on this alrady
+
+-> we need aggregation/interpretation/analysis of that data
+
+== Further Wishlist
+
+* move SMSC out of OsmoMSC
+* GSUP to MAP gateway
+* billing interfaces
+* LTE MME/S-GW-/P-GW
+** biggest issue is lack of good FOSS asn.1 tools for C
+** we either have to ditch C, or invest lots of time in tools :/
+
+== EOF
+
+End of File
personal git repositories of Harald Welte. Your mileage may vary