1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
|
Osmocom Testing Initiative
==========================
:author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
:copyright: 2018 by Harald Welte (License: CC-BY-SA)
:backend: slidy
:max-width: 45em
== Osmocom testing until mid-2017
* manual testing
* unit tests for some small portion of mostly utility functions
** `make check` in the respective repository executes them
* VTY interface interactive testing using specific python test code
== split NITB aftermath (the good parts)
* biggest architectural change since we started in 2008
* lots of good reasons and design improvements
** finite state machines with proper timeouts / clean-up
** proper 3GPP AoIP with interoperability testing
** no synchronous HLR database access
** HLR access from OsmoMSC and OsmoSGSN
** 2G/3G authentication over GERAN and UTRAN
== split NITB aftermath (the bad parts)
[role="incremental"]
* never-ending list of breakage
** actual regressions of things that used to work before
** things that were _known omissions_ during the restructuring
* some commercial users stuck with SCCPlite and thus old @osmo-bsc-sccplite@
** almost none of the new features or bug fixes there
** no automatic testing
** back-ports time-consuming
== split NITB aftermath (lessons learned)
* overall complexity of Osmocom cellular is quite stunning now
* absence of proper functional testing has caused massive fall-out
* the split architecture allows for better testing of smaller parts of the system
* my personal main focus of the last 11+ months:
[role="incremental"]
** testing, testing, testing, testing
** testing, testing, testing, testing
** some more testing
** even more testing
== Osmocom CNI testing (1/2)
[role="incremental"]
* unit test (autotest, like we always had)
** test individual functions / APIs of libraries / programs
** executed during "make check" and hence before any patch can get merged
* automatized functional tests in TTCN-3
** test _external_ visible behavior on interfaces such as Abis, A, GSUP, GTP, MNCC, PCUIF, CTRL, VTY, ...
** executed nightly by Jenkins (could be more frequently)
== Osmocom CNI testing (2/2)
[role="incremental"]
* osmo-gsm-tester
** tests entire Osmocom network with BTS/BSC/MSC/HLR/PCU/SGSN/GGSN/...
** uses real BTS + MS hardware (over coaxial cable)
** automatic execution multiple times per day
* interop tests
** against NG40 RAN + CN simulator from NG4T (A / Gb / Iu level)
** not fully automatized yet
== Osmocom TTCN-3 Test Suites
* developed in 2017+2018
* compiled using Eclipse TITAN
** uses just a command-line compiler + Makefiles
** no IDE needed at all, don't let _Eclipse_ fool you
* containerized in Docker
* executed by Jenkins CI
== Terminology
ATS:: Abstract Test Suite
MTC:: Main Test Component
PTC:: Parallel Test Component
IUT:: Implementation Under Test
== Test Suite Philosophy
* test one network element (our IUT)
* test external behavior (3GPP and non-3GPP)
* emulate entire environment from TTCN-3
* don't reuse Osmocom C-code protocol implementations in the tests
* test against independent TTCN-3 implementations!
== What to test?
* successful cases
* erroneous cases (no answer, NACK, ...)
** many difficult to reproduce with real phones/devices
* load / resource exhaustion
* spec compliance
* focus on functionality actually relevant to IUT
== Why TTCN-3 + TITAN
* TTCN-3 specifically designed for telecom protocol testing
* TITAN team released many telecom protocols in TTCN-3, such as
** BSSAP, L3 (RR/MM/CC), SMS (CP/RP/TP), SS, M3UA, SCCP, GTP, NS, BSSGP, ...
** shortens our test development cycle
** permits us to test against known working industry implementations
== Test suites for Osmocom CNI components
* `osmo-bts`
* `osmo-bsc` (for both AoIP and SCCPlite)
* `osmo-msc`
* `osmo-mgw`
* `osmo-hlr`
* `osmo-sip-connector`
* `osmo-sgsn`
* `osmo-ggsn`
== Test suites in progress
* `osmo-pcu`
* `osmo-bsc_nat`
* `osmo-gbproxy`
== BTS_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** A-bis side: RSL (emulates BSC-side server)
** Um side: L1CTL to control MS
** PCU side: pcu_socket
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
{ rank=same; BTS, BSC};
BTS [label="IUT\nosmo-bts-trx",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nBTS_Tests.ttcn"];
BSC [label="osmo-bsc\nOML only"];
BTS -> fake_trx [label="bursts"];
fake_trx -> trxcon [label="bursts"];
trxcon -> ATS [label="bursts"];
BTS -> BSC [label="A-bis OML"];
BTS -> ATS [label="A-bis RSL"];
ATS -> BTS [label="pcu_sock"];
ATS -> BSC [label="VTY"];
ATS -> BTS [label="CTRL"];
}
----
== BSC_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** A-bis side: RSL (emulates BTS-side client)
** A-side: BSSAP/SCCP/M3UA (emulates MSC-side)
** MGW side: MGCP (emulates MGW side)
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
{ rank=same; BTS; STP; };
BSC [label="IUT\nosmo-bsc",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nBSC_Tests.ttcn"];
BTS [label="osmo-bts-omldummy\nOML only"];
BTS -> BSC [label="A-bis OML"];
ATS -> BSC [label="A-bis RSL"];
ATS -> BSC [label="CTRL"];
ATS -> BSC [label="VTY"];
ATS -> STP [label="A BSSAP\nSCCP/M3UA"];
BSC -> STP [label="A BSSAP\nSCCP/M3UA"];
}
----
== MSC_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** A: BSSAP/SCCP/M3UA (emulates BSC-side)
** MNCC: MNCC/unix-domain (emulates ext. MNCC side)
** MGW: MGCP (emulates MGW side)
** GSUP (implements HLR side)
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
MSC [label="IUT\nosmo-msc",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nMSC_Tests.ttcn"];
ATS -> MSC [label="MNCC"];
ATS -> MSC [label="SMPP",style="dashed"];
ATS -> MSC [label="CTRL"];
ATS -> MSC [label="VTY"];
MSC -> ATS [label="GSUP"];
ATS -> STP [label="A BSSAP\nSCCP/M3UA"];
MSC -> STP [label="A BSSAP\nSCCP/M3UA"];
}
----
== MGCP_Test.ttcn
* external interfaces
** MGCP (emulates call agent)
** RTP (stream source/sink)
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
MGW [label="IUT\nosmo-mgw",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nMGCP_Test.ttcn"];
ATS -> MGW [label="RTP"];
ATS -> MGW [label="MGCP"];
MGW -> ATS [label="RTP"];
}
----
== HLR_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** GSUP (emulates VLR/SGSN side)
** VTY
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
HLR [label="IUT\nosmo-hlr",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nHLR_Tests.ttcn"];
ATS -> HLR [label="GSUP"];
ATS -> HLR [label="VTY"];
}
----
== SIP_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** MNCC (emulates MSC side)
** SIP (emulates SIP switch)
** VTY
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
SIP [label="SIP\nosmo-sip-connector",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nSIP_Tests.ttcn"];
ATS -> SIP [label="MNCC"];
ATS -> SIP [label="SIP"];
ATS -> SIP [label="VTY"];
}
----
== SGSN_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** Gb (emulates PCU side NS/BSSGP + MS)
** GSUP (emulates HLR)
** VTY
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
SGSN [label="SGSN\nosmo-sgsn",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nSGSN_Tests.ttcn"];
ATS -> SGSN [label="Gb"];
SGSN-> ATS [label="Gp (GTP)"];
ATS -> SGSN [label="VTY"];
}
----
== GGSN_Tests.ttcn
* external interfaces
** Gp: GTP (emulates SGSN)
** Gi: IP (emulates Internet)
[graphviz]
----
digraph G {
rankdir=LR;
GGSN [label="GGSN\nosmo-ggsn",shape="box"];
ATS [label="ATS\nGGSN_Tests.ttcn"];
ATS -> GGSN [label="Gp (GTP)"];
GGSN -> ATS [label="Gi (IP)"];
ATS -> GGSN [label="VTY"];
}
----
== Dockerized Setup
* one process per container
* packages either
** IUT (e.g. `osmo-bsc`)
** ATS (compiled docker test suite)
** other utility (e.g. `trxcon` or `osmo-bts-omldummy`)
* why?
** no need for local ip/network configuration
** standardized / packaged setup on every machine
** run older/newer versions of ATS against older/newer IUT
== Jenkins CI Execution
. update `docker-playground.git`
.. contains `Dockerfile` for ATS + IUT
. rebuild IUT container[s] (e.g. `osmo-bts-master`)
.. git magic ensures re-build only if `osmo-bts.git` master changed
. rebuild ATS container (e.g. `ttcn3-bts-test`)
.. git magic ensures re-build only if `osmo-ttcn3-hacks.git` master changed
. run `docker-playground/ttcn3-bts-test/jenkins.sh`
.. creates docker network
.. starts IUT + ATS docker containers
.. collects test results
== Jenkins CI Reporting
* junit-xml generation
* store artefacts
** pcap file of every test case
** ATS log file (TTCN-3 testsuite)
** IUT log file[s] (`osmo-*.log`)
** IUT config file[s] (`osmo-*.cfg`)
* see https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/view/TTCN3/
== Further Reading
* http://git.osmocom.org/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/
* http://git.osmocom.org/docker-playground/
* http://osmocom.org/projects/cellular-infrastructure/wiki/Titan_TTCN3_Notes
== EOF
End of File
|