1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
|
Year 2017 Osmocom retrospective
===============================
:author: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
:copyright: 2018 by Harald Welte (License: CC-BY-SA)
:backend: slidy
:max-width: 45em
== 2017 - a year of change
Osmocom CNI (Cellular Network Infrastructure) has changed a lot:
* software changes
* team / developer changes
* sysmocom company focus changes
== 2017 - CNI Software changes
* OsmoBSC migration from SCCPlite to 3GPP AoIP
* OsmoMGW as integral part of both BSC and MSC
* NITB split into separate MSC, HLR, BSC
* 3G (IuCS, IuPS) goes mainline
== 2016/2017/2018 - Team changes
* Q1 2016: Jacob Erlbeck leaves sysmocom
** unfortunately a complete loss to Osmocom, particularly OsmoPCU
* 2017: Holger Freyther leaves sysmocom
** unfortunately also shift of focus away from Osmocom :(
** immense loss to the project in terms of skill and capacity
* Q1 2018: Max Suraev leaves sysmocom
** another loss of lots of Osmocom knowledge
== sysmocom changes
* we used to have to do lots of non-Osmocom work to cross-subsidize Osmocom
** big distraction of resources in 2014/2015, now gone
* we used to cross-subsidize Osmocom development by hardware sales
** not happening as much anymore
* we now work almost 100% on Osmocom
** R&D projects, support contracts and grants
== split NITB aftermath (the good parts)
* biggest architectural change since we started in 2008
* lots of good reasons and design improvements
** finite state machines with proper timeouts / clean-up
** proper 3GPP AoIP with interoperability tesing
** no synchronous HLR database access
** HLR access from OsmoMSC and OsmoSGSN
** 2G/3G authentication over GERAN and UTRAN
== split NITB aftermath (the bad parts)
[role="incremental"]
* never-ending list of breakage
** actual regressions of things that used to work before
** things that were _known omissions_ during the restructuring
* some commercial users stuck with SCCPlite and thus old @osmo-bsc-sccplite@
** almost none of the new features or bug fixes there
** no automatic testing
** back-ports time-consuming
== split NITB aftermath (lessons learned)
* overall complexity of Osomcoom cellular is quite stunning now
* absence of proper functional testing has caused massive fall-out
* the split architecture allows for betteer testing of smaller parts of the system
* my personal main focus of the last 5+ months:
[role="incremental"]
** testing, testing, testing, testing
** testing, testing, testing, testing
** some more testing
** even more testing
== Osmocom CNI testing (1/2)
[role="incremental"]
* unit test (autotest, like we always had)
** test individual functions / APIs of libraries / programs
** executed during "make check" and hence before any patch can get merged
* automatized functional tests in TTCN-3
** test _external_ visible behavior on interfaces such as Abis, A, GSUP, GTP, MNCC, PCUIF, CTRL, VTY, ...
** executed nightly by Jenkins (could be more frequently)
== Osmocom CNI testing (2/2)
[role="incremental"]
* osmo-gsm-tester
** tests entire Osmoocom network with BTS/BSC/MSC/HLR/PCU/SGSN/GGSN/...
** uses real BTS + MS hardware (over coaxial cable)
** automatic execution multiple times per day
* interop tests
** against NG40 RAN + CN simulator from NG4% (A / Gb / Iu level)
** not fully automatized yet
== Osmocom project health (CNI)
[role="incremental"]
* lots of funded developments, *but*
** primarily _enterprise features_ required by professional users
* dominance of sysmocom is problematic
** sustainable FOSS has no single point of failure!
* we need more contributions from third parties
** particularly those that benefit commercially from Osmocom
== Osmocom project health (other projects)
[role="incremental"]
* OsmocomTETRA dead since 2012, occasional small fixes
* No OsmocomBB ports to other PHY/chip yet
* OsmocomDECT completely dead
* Erlang core network projects dead
* Smalltalk projects dead (AFAICT)
* SIMtrace dead for years, about to be resurrected
== Osmocom project health (other projects)
[role="incremental"]
* gr-osmosdr very low commit ratio
* rtl-sdr no commits in 2015-2017
* but it's not that bad... (see next slide)
== Osmocom project health (other projects)
[role="incremental"]
* gr-gsm, fake_trx and trxcon a welcome change in OsmocomBB
* osmocom-analog (jolly to the rescue)
* osmo-fl2k (soon! now! this year!)
== Osmocom status (CNI)
[role="incremental"]
* CS RAN (BTS, BSC) is quite strong/complete these days
** ready to be used with 3rd party CN
* PS RAN (PCU) suffers from lack of attention
** lack of automatic testsuite with decent coverage
** lack of uplink multi-slot any many EGPRS features
* CS CN (MSC, HLR)
** in halthy state, but lack of TCAP/MAP interface limits us to non-roaming networks
* PS CN (SGSN, GGSN)
** in good health, now with IPv6 supoprt and kernel GTP acceleration
== Osmocom outlook (CNI)
* 2G still in demand by lots of use cases (rural, maritime, ...)
** if we had TCAP/MAP interface, many more deployments possible
* 3G has some users but lack of FOSS RNC limits us to femtocells
* 4G is deployed in parallel to 2G in many scenarios
** Osmocom 2G stack needs 2G-4G integration (SGs, DIAMETER)
** Osmocom needs to contribute to FOSS 4G projects (nextepc, srsLTE)
* irony: Now that it's possible to do properly funded Osmocom development, we have less people involved than in the early days :(
If we don't manage to focus on 4G soon, interest in 2G will diminish soon
== Osmocom outlook (other projects)
[role="incremental"]
* activity of original/traditional Osmocom developers decreased
* without attracting more developers, a lot of projects will remain dormant and/or never realize their potential
* I'd love to work on TETRA, DMR or other mobile communications technology
** but lack of developers and contributors even for 2G makes me stuck in 2G CNI land :(
== Personal Request
[role="incremental"]
* Osmocom needs you!
* we've lost too many friends already
* please don't leave Osmocom; please don't leave me
== Further Reading
See my detailed 2017 review:
* http://osmocom.org/news/84
== EOF
End of File
|
