diff options
author | Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> | 2015-10-25 21:00:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> | 2015-10-25 21:00:20 +0100 |
commit | fca59bea770346cf1c1f9b0e00cb48a61b44a8f3 (patch) | |
tree | a2011270df48d3501892ac1a56015c8be57e8a7d /2003/opensource-astaro2003 |
import of old now defunct presentation slides svn repo
Diffstat (limited to '2003/opensource-astaro2003')
-rw-r--r-- | 2003/opensource-astaro2003/brainstorming | 105 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | 2003/opensource-astaro2003/opensource-astaro2003.mgp | 185 |
2 files changed, 290 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2003/opensource-astaro2003/brainstorming b/2003/opensource-astaro2003/brainstorming new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f501973 --- /dev/null +++ b/2003/opensource-astaro2003/brainstorming @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +What is open source? How does it work? +Who writes code for nothing and why? + +- traditional software model + - product-oriented + - company finances development of software + - same copy of software object code is sold under a very restrictive + license + - license fees refinance cost of development + - enforcement of restrictive license guarantees revenue + - advantages + - proven business model + - disadvantage + - have to develop everything on your own or buy licenses of 3rd + party software + - less flexibility for the customer + - does the customer trust the 'black box' you are selling? + - if vendor goes out of business, no bugfixes/updates + +- open source model + - service based + - individual parties contribute code parts + - software is distributed for free + - software is distributed under very permissive license + - service / support / customization refinance development + - advantages + - vast amount of available FOSS can be used as foundation for + own products + - source code is available for peer review + - bug fixes for free, people just send you patches + - new features impelemented by your users! + - disadvantage + - business model has yet to be proven to work + +- important open source license + - BSD style license + - permits any use of the sourcecode as long as copyright notice + remains + - GPL (GNU General Public License) + - source for resulting binary has to be provided + - ensures that derivates of free software are still free + - LGPL (GNU Lesser General Public License) + - permits linking with non-gpl code (mainly used for libraries) + +- difference free software / open source + - term 'free software' (free as in freedom, not beer) introduced by + Stallman / FSF 1984. + - focus on political/ethical/philosophical freedom + - open source software (OSS) introduced by OSI in 1997 + - focus on technological advantage by means of source review + - most FOSS licenses match both definitions, OSS less restrictive + +- history of FOSS + - initially software always for free in source (e.g. IBM S/360) + - as hardware gets less expensive, companies start to license + software for money + - some people (Stallman, et. al.) didn't want to give up the freedom + they're used to. + - 1983: GNU project is founded, goal: Implementation of a free UNIX-like + operating system + - 1984: Free Software Foundation is established as non-for-profit legal + entity behind the GNU project + - 1991: Linus Torvalds releases the first version of the Linux Kernel + under the GNU GPL license. Together with the other parts from the + GNU project and others, a 100% free operating system is available + - 1994-2000: Free Software is increasingly recognized as reliable, + stable alternative to proprietary software + +- Who is behind FOSS? + - in the beginning mostly computer enthusiasts with academic background + - motivation through + - fight: david <-> goliath + - to show how bad most proprietary software is + - to make the internet a better place + - to work together with _very_ good programmers + - to gain more experience / better reputation + - more and more commercial entities recognize the value of FOSS + - contributions to existing projects + - start of new projects + - contracting consultants and FOSS companies for implementation + of missing features + - experienced end-users + - independent consultants + - academic institutions (e.g. exim, cyrus) + - mixed FOSS / proprietary companies (like Astaro) + - use FOSS as foundation for their proprietary solutions + - have a vital need for a reliable and up-to-date foundation, + thus contribute back to and/or fund FOSS + +- development process, communication + - everybody who agrees to the license can contribute code + - project is usually started by a single developer or a small group + - different actors: + - maintainer: official person to maintain the code, responsible + - core team: small group of leaders behind the project + - developers: people who write code on a regular basis + - contibutors: people who contribute a single feature or a bug + fix from time to time + - users: people who use the software, often organized on + mailinglists, newsgroups, user groups, .. + - main communication medium are mailinglists + - every developer can be contacted directly via email + - leaders/managers are people with the best technical skills, unlike the 'commercial world' where you need certain diploma, connections, ... + - communication is random. no manager <-> manager talk about technical + stuff they don't understand diff --git a/2003/opensource-astaro2003/opensource-astaro2003.mgp b/2003/opensource-astaro2003/opensource-astaro2003.mgp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..119e40c --- /dev/null +++ b/2003/opensource-astaro2003/opensource-astaro2003.mgp @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +%include "default.mgp" +%default 1 bgrad +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +%nodefault +%back "blue" + +%center +%size 7 + + +What is Open Source / Free Software ? + + + +%center +%size 4 +by + +Harald Welte <hwelte@astaro.com> +Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Contents + + + The traditional (proprietary) software model + The Free / Open Source software model + Important Free / Open Source software licenses + Difference Free Software / Open Source + History of Free / Open Source software + Who is behind FOSS? + Development Process + Thanks + + + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +The traditional (proprietary) software model + + traditional software model + product-oriented + vendor finances development of software + business model of software based on secret source code + same copy of software object code is sold under a very restrictive license + license fees refinance cost of development + enforcement of restrictive license guarantees revenue + advantages + proven business model + disadvantage + vendor has to develop everything on his own or buy licenses of 3rd party software + less flexibility for the customer + does the customer trust the 'black box' you are selling? + if vendor goes out of business, no bugfixes/updates + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +The free / open source software model + + Open Source / Free Software model + service based + individual parties contribute code parts + software is distributed for free + software source code is distributed under very permissive license + service / support / customization refinance development + advantages + vast amount of available FOSS can be used as foundation for own products + source code is available for peer review + bug fixes for free, people just send you patches + new features impelemented by your users! + disadvantage + business model has yet to prove scalability + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Difference Free Software / Open Source + + difference free software / open source + free software + term 'free software' (free as in freedom, not beer) introduced by Richard Stallman / FSF 1984. + focus on political/ethical/philosophical freedom + open source + term 'open source' software (OSS) introduced by OSI in 1997 + focus on technological advantage by means of source review + most FOSS licenses match both definitions, OSS less restrictive + FOSS is _not_ to be mistaken as freeware / shareware! + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Important FOSS licenses + + + important free / open source license + BSD (Berkeley Systems Derivate) style license + permits any use of the sourcecode as long as copyright notice remains + GPL (GNU General Public License) + source for resulting binary has to be provided + ensures that derivates of free software are still free + LGPL (GNU Lesser General Public License) + permits linking with non-gpl code (mainly used for libraries) + + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +History of Free / Open Source Software + + history of free / open source software + initially software always for free in source (e.g. IBM S/360) + as hardware gets less expensive, companies start to license software for money + some people (Stallman, et. al.) didn't want to give up the freedom they're used to. + 1983: GNU project is founded, goal: Implementation of a free UNIX-like operating system + 1984: Free Software Foundation is established as non-for-profit legal entity behind the GNU project + 1991: Linus Torvalds releases the first version of the Linux Kernel under the GNU GPL license. Together with the other parts from the GNU project and others, a 100% free operating system is available + 1994-1999: FOSS is increasingly recognized as reliable, stable alternative to proprietary software, esp. in the server + networking market + 2000-2003: FOSS is increasingly considered as an alternative on the desktop (see recent decision by Munich city administration, respective laws in latin america, ...) + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Who is behind FOSS? + + individuals + computer enthusiasts motivated by + fight: david <-> goliath + ability to show how poorly implemented most proprietary software is + ability to gain more experience / better reputation + experienced end-users + independent consultants + looking for a solution to a particular problem and already have 95% by using existing FOSS + organizations + commercial entities who recognize the value of FOSS + contributions to existing projects + start of new projects + contracting consultants and FOSS companies for implementation of missing features + mixed FOSS / proprietary companies (like Astaro) + use FOSS as foundation for their proprietary solutions + have a vital need for a reliable and up-to-date foundation, thus contribute back to and/or fund FOSS + academic institutions (e.g. exim, cyrus) + are traditionally involved in the exchange of research results. Why treat software differently? + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Development Process + + development process, communication + everybody who agrees to the license can contribute code + project is usually started by a single developer or a small group + different actors in development process + maintainer: official person to maintain the code, responsible + core team: small group of leaders behind the project + developers: people who write code on a regular basis + contibutors: people who contribute a single feature or a bug fix from time to time + users: people who use the software, often organized on mailinglists, newsgroups, user groups, .. + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Development Process + + main communication medium are mailinglists + every developer can be contacted directly via email + leaders/managers are people with the best technical skills, unlike the 'commercial world' where you need certain diploma, connections, ... + communication is random. no manager <-> manager talk about technical stuff they don't understand + +%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% +%page +What is Free / Open Source Software (FOSS) +Thanks + + in the name of the netfilter/iptables project, thanks to Astaro for funding + particular tasks on my schedule + equipment (dual Opteron below my desk) + my travel expenses to many FOSS conferences + the netfilter developer workshop in August 2003 (Budapest, HU) + + |