import of old now defunct presentation slides svn repo

12 files changed, 975 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/c123_pcb.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/c123_pcb.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a9f24fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/c123_pcb.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/ezcap_top.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/ezcap_top.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d504471
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/ezcap_top.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/fcdp.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/fcdp.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..329bd82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/fcdp.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/fcdp_pcb.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/fcdp_pcb.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6b4f94d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/fcdp_pcb.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.pdf b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0a2a69e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.pdf
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.snm b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.snm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.snm
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.tex b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fa3ede4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,464 @@
+% $Header: /cvsroot/latex-beamer/latex-beamer/solutions/conference-talks/conference-ornate-20min.en.tex,v 1.7 2007/01/28 20:48:23 tantau Exp $
+
+\documentclass{beamer}
+
+\usepackage{url}
+\makeatletter
+\def\url@leostyle{%
+  \@ifundefined{selectfont}{\def\UrlFont{\sf}}{\def\UrlFont{\tiny\ttfamily}}}
+\makeatother
+%% Now actually use the newly defined style.
+\urlstyle{leo}
+
+
+% This file is a solution template for:
+
+% - Talk at a conference/colloquium.
+% - Talk length is about 20min.
+% - Style is ornate.
+
+
+
+% Copyright 2004 by Till Tantau <tantau@users.sourceforge.net>.
+%
+% In principle, this file can be redistributed and/or modified under
+% the terms of the GNU Public License, version 2.
+%
+% However, this file is supposed to be a template to be modified
+% for your own needs. For this reason, if you use this file as a
+% template and not specifically distribute it as part of a another
+% package/program, I grant the extra permission to freely copy and
+% modify this file as you see fit and even to delete this copyright
+% notice. 
+
+
+\mode<presentation>
+{
+  \usetheme{Warsaw}
+  % or ...
+
+  \setbeamercovered{transparent}
+  % or whatever (possibly just delete it)
+}
+
+
+\usepackage[english]{babel}
+% or whatever
+
+\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
+% or whatever
+
+\usepackage{times}
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
+% Or whatever. Note that the encoding and the font should match. If T1
+% does not look nice, try deleting the line with the fontenc.
+
+
+\title{Free and Open Source Software in SDR}
+
+%\subtitle {community based Free / Open Source Software for communications}
+
+\author{Harald Welte <hwelte@sysmocom.de>}
+
+\institute
+{osmocom.org\\sysmocom GmbH}
+% - Use the \inst command only if there are several affiliations.
+% - Keep it simple, no one is interested in your street address.
+
+\date[] % (optional, should be abbreviation of conference name)
+{June 29, SDR'12 - WInnForum Europe}
+% - Either use conference name or its abbreviation.
+% - Not really informative to the audience, more for people (including
+%   yourself) who are reading the slides online
+
+\subject{Communications}
+% This is only inserted into the PDF information catalog. Can be left
+% out. 
+
+
+
+% If you have a file called "university-logo-filename.xxx", where xxx
+% is a graphic format that can be processed by latex or pdflatex,
+% resp., then you can add a logo as follows:
+
+% \pgfdeclareimage[height=0.5cm]{university-logo}{university-logo-filename}
+% \logo{\pgfuseimage{university-logo}}
+
+
+
+% Delete this, if you do not want the table of contents to pop up at
+% the beginning of each subsection:
+%\AtBeginSubsection[]
+%{
+%  \begin{frame}<beamer>{Outline}
+%    \tableofcontents[currentsection,currentsubsection]
+%  \end{frame}
+%}
+
+
+% If you wish to uncover everything in a step-wise fashion, uncomment
+% the following command: 
+
+%\beamerdefaultoverlayspecification{<+->}
+
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \titlepage
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Outline}
+  \tableofcontents[hideallsubsections]
+  % You might wish to add the option [pausesections]
+\end{frame}
+
+
+% Structuring a talk is a difficult task and the following structure
+% may not be suitable. Here are some rules that apply for this
+% solution: 
+
+% - Exactly two or three sections (other than the summary).
+% - At *most* three subsections per section.
+% - Talk about 30s to 2min per frame. So there should be between about
+%   15 and 30 frames, all told.
+
+% - A conference audience is likely to know very little of what you
+%   are going to talk about. So *simplify*!
+% - In a 20min talk, getting the main ideas across is hard
+%   enough. Leave out details, even if it means being less precise than
+%   you think necessary.
+% - If you omit details that are vital to the proof/implementation,
+%   just say so once. Everybody will be happy with that.
+
+\begin{frame}{About the speaker}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Linux Kernel / bootloader / driver / firmware developmer since 1999
+	\item IT security expert, focus on network protocol security
+	\item Former core developer of Linux packet filter netfilter/iptables
+	\item Board-level Electrical Engineering
+	\item Always looking for interesting protocols (RFID, DECT, GSM)
+	\item OpenPCD, Openmoko, deDECTed.org, OpenBSC, OsmocomBB, OsmoSGSN
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{About sysmocom GmbH}{systems for mobile communications}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item small company, started by two Osmocom developers in Berlin
+	\item provides commercial R\&d and support for professional
+		users of Osmocom software
+	\item develops its own products like sysmoBTS (inexpensive,
+		small-form-factor, OpenBSC compatible BTS)
+	\item runs a small webshop for Osmocom related hardware like
+		OsmocomBB compatible phones, SIMtrace, etc.
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{Free and Open Source Software}
+
+\subsection{Where is FOSS today}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) is everywhere
+	\item Particularly Servers and all areas of Embedded
+	\item FOSS has fundamentally changed the software industry
+	\item Systems architecture of products becomes more complex
+	\item Nobody can afford to build complex products from scratch
+	\item Everyone builds products on existing FOSS components,
+		particularly the Linux kernel and other OS-level
+		components
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Linux and Free Software (FOSS) everywhere}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=100mm]{linux_netfilter_singapore_entertainment.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item FOSS is not a technology
+	\item FOSS is not a product
+	\item FOSS is not a company
+	\item FOSS is a development methodology and culture
+	\item Only companies with sufficient FOSS experience understand
+		the value of how to interact with the wider FOSS
+		communities
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item FOSS enables participation
+	\item you don't have to work for a specific company in order to
+		do OS development
+	\item nobody has to have any formal relationship with their
+		collaborators, suppliers.
+	\item any {\em nobody} can contribute, even so-called amateurs,
+		hobbyists, students
+	\item it doesn't matter how deep your pockets are
+	\item meritocracy (the better your merits, the more you have a
+		say in the development process)
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{FOSS: Democracy / Equal Access}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item The means of productions (Computers, OS, Compilers) are
+		abundant and inexpensive (for the first world)
+	\item Anyone can create and produce software, all you need is
+		your brain
+	\item No membership required in exclusive forums, industry
+		clubs, consortia
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{FOSS and SDR}
+
+\begin{frame}{Traditional Radio Engineering}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Traditional radio development required electrical
+		engineering in hardware.  You have to
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item know analog / RF electronics
+		\item spin board revisions / prototypes
+		\item actually physically build something
+	\end{itemize}
+	\item Aside from the skills, there is a significant non-HR cost
+		involved for actually doing this development
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{SDR and FOSS}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item SDR transforms radio engineering into the software domain
+	\item In Software, all you need to do R\&D is a bit of general-purpose hardware and your brains
+	\item With inexpensive general-purpose SDR hardware, the same
+		conditions apply to development of radio software!
+	\item Participatory, collaborative, community driven R\&D
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{SDR hardware popular in community SDR projects}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item When you (the audience) thinks of SDR, it's probably
+		mostly bleeding-edge high-end and high-cost
+	\item At the same time, if you don't have the same high-end
+		requirements, SDR receiver hardware is available cheap
+	\item commoditization effect
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}{The USRP family}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item probably the most-used SDR hardware in the FOSS world
+	\item still the primarily radio used with gnuradio today
+	\item at the low end of the 'professional sdr' price segment
+	\item still, typical configuration costs > 1000 USD
+	\item not everyone is able to spend that (students, hobbyists,
+		especially outside first world countries)
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\subsection{Fun Cube Dongle Pro}
+
+\begin{frame}{Fun Cube Dongle Pro (2010)}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item 64 MHz to 1700 Mhz USB SDR receiver (193 USD)
+	\item limited to 96 kHz I/Q baseband sampling
+	\item great for amateur radio and TETRA, but most other
+communications systems (like GSM introduced in 1992) use wider band-widths
+	\item great progress in terms of size and cost, but much more
+limited than USRP
+	\item Hardware design and firmware sadly are proprietary
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Fun Cube Dongle Pro (2010)}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=110mm]{fcdp_pcb.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{OsmoSDR}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmoSDR (2012)}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item small, low-power / low-cost USB SDR hardware (225 USD)
+	\item higher bandwidth than FunCubeDonglePro (1.2 Ms/s / 14bit)
+	\item much lower cost than USRP, but more expensive than FCDP
+	\item Open Hardware (schematics), software (FPGA, firmware)
+	\item Undergoing another re-spin for 4.2 Ms/s @ 14bit
+\end{itemize}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=70mm]{osmosdr.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{rtl-sdr}
+
+\begin{frame}{Realtek RTL2832U based DVB-T receivers}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Realtek RTL2832U based DVB-T receivers are cheaply
+		available on the market (USD 20)
+	\item RTL2832U implements ADC, DVB-T demodulator and high-speed
+		USB device
+	\item Normal mode of operation includes full DVB-T receiver
+		inside RTL2832U hardware and only sends MPEG2-TS via USB
+	\item Reverse engineering the USB protocol and replaying certain
+		commands from custom libusb based code was able to trigger the raw
+		sample transmission to the host PC
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{RTL2832U based devices: EzTV 668}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=110mm]{ezcap_top.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{RTL2832U based devices: Hama nano1}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=110mm]{hama_nano1.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{Free Software SDR software}
+
+\begin{frame}{Gnuradio}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Philosophy: Implement SDR not as hand-crafted special-case hand-optimized assembly code in some obscure DSP, but on a general purpose PC
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item with modern x86 systems at multi-GHz clock speeds and with many cores this becomes feasible
+		\item of course way too expensive for a mass-produced product, but very suitable for research, teaching and rapid prototyping
+	\end{itemize}
+	\item Implement various signal processing elements in C++
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item assembly optimized libraries for low-level operations
+		\item provide python bindings for all blocks
+	\end{itemize}
+	\item Python script to define interaction, relation, signal~routing between blocks
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{gnuradio based waveform implementations}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Of course plenty of gr-based implementations for the various analog
+		modulation schemes
+	\item Check out CGRAN (comprehensive gnuradio archive network):
+		Includes 802.11, Zigbee, RDS, DECT, AIS, UHF RFID, ADS-B
+	\item Many other projects out of academia and community, such as
+		OpenLTE (early stage of downlink Rx/Tx)
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Osmocom / osmocom.org}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Osmocom == Open Source Mobile Communications
+	\item Classic collaborative, community-driven FOSS project
+	\item Gathers creative people who want to explore this
+		industry-dominated closed mobile communications world
+	\item http://osmocom.org/
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item non-sdr sub-projects like L2/L3 protocol stacks
+		\item sdr sub-projects for mostly Rx side
+	\end{itemize}
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}{OpenBSC}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item first Osmocom project
+	\item Implements GSM A-bis interface towards BTS
+	\item Supports Siemens, ip.access, Ericsson and Nokia BTS
+	\item can implement only BSC function (osmo-bsc) or a fully
+		autonomous self-contained GSM network (osmo-nitb) that
+		requires no external MSC/VLR/AUC/HLR/EIR
+	\item deployed in > 200 installations world-wide, commercial and
+		research
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomBB}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Full baseband processor firmware implementation of a mobile phone (MS)
+	\item We re-use existing phone hardware and re-wrote the L1, L2,
+		L3 and higher level logic
+	\item Higher layers reuse code from OpenBSC wherever possible
+	\item Used in a number of universities and other research contexts (including Ericsson Research)
+\end{itemize}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=50mm]{c123_pcb.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomTETRA}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item SDR implementation of a TETRA radio-modem (PHY/MAC)
+	\item Rx is fully implemented, Tx only partial
+	\item Can be used for air interface interception
+	\item Accompanied by wireshark dissectors for the TETRA protocol
+		stack
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomGMR}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item ETSI GMR (Geo Mobile Radio) is "GSM for satellites"
+	\item GMR-1 used by Thuraya satellite network
+	\item OsmocomGMR implements SDR based radiomodem + PHY/MAC (Rx)
+	\item Partial wireshark dissectors for the protocol stack
+	\item Reverse engineered implementation of GMR-A5 crypto
+	\item Speech codec is proprietary, still needs reverse engineering
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomOP25}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item APCO25 is Professional PMR system used in the US
+	\item Can be compared to TETRA in Europe
+	\item OsmocomOP25 is again SDR receiver + protocol analyzer
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{The OpenBTS Um - SIP bridge}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item OpenBTS is a SDR implementation of GSM Um radio interface
+	\item directly bridges to SIP/RTP, no A-bis/BSC/A/MSC
+	\item suitable for research on air interface, but very different
+		from traditional GSM networks
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{airprobe.org}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item SDR implementation of Um sniffer
+	\item suitable for receiving GSM Um downlink and uplink
+	\item predates all of the other projects
+	\item more or less abandoned at this point
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}{Thanks}
+Thanks for your attention.  I hope we have time for Q\&A.
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\end{document}
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.tex.bak b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.tex.bak
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..118fcce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/foss-sdr12europe.tex.bak
@@ -0,0 +1,464 @@
+% $Header: /cvsroot/latex-beamer/latex-beamer/solutions/conference-talks/conference-ornate-20min.en.tex,v 1.7 2007/01/28 20:48:23 tantau Exp $
+
+\documentclass{beamer}
+
+\usepackage{url}
+\makeatletter
+\def\url@leostyle{%
+  \@ifundefined{selectfont}{\def\UrlFont{\sf}}{\def\UrlFont{\tiny\ttfamily}}}
+\makeatother
+%% Now actually use the newly defined style.
+\urlstyle{leo}
+
+
+% This file is a solution template for:
+
+% - Talk at a conference/colloquium.
+% - Talk length is about 20min.
+% - Style is ornate.
+
+
+
+% Copyright 2004 by Till Tantau <tantau@users.sourceforge.net>.
+%
+% In principle, this file can be redistributed and/or modified under
+% the terms of the GNU Public License, version 2.
+%
+% However, this file is supposed to be a template to be modified
+% for your own needs. For this reason, if you use this file as a
+% template and not specifically distribute it as part of a another
+% package/program, I grant the extra permission to freely copy and
+% modify this file as you see fit and even to delete this copyright
+% notice. 
+
+
+\mode<presentation>
+{
+  \usetheme{Warsaw}
+  % or ...
+
+  \setbeamercovered{transparent}
+  % or whatever (possibly just delete it)
+}
+
+
+\usepackage[english]{babel}
+% or whatever
+
+\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
+% or whatever
+
+\usepackage{times}
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
+% Or whatever. Note that the encoding and the font should match. If T1
+% does not look nice, try deleting the line with the fontenc.
+
+
+\title{Free and Open Source Software in SDR}
+
+%\subtitle {community based Free / Open Source Software for communications}
+
+\author{Harald Welte <hwelte@sysmocom.de>}
+
+\institute
+{osmocom.org\\sysmocom GmbH}
+% - Use the \inst command only if there are several affiliations.
+% - Keep it simple, no one is interested in your street address.
+
+\date[] % (optional, should be abbreviation of conference name)
+{June 29, SDR'12 - WInnForum Europe}
+% - Either use conference name or its abbreviation.
+% - Not really informative to the audience, more for people (including
+%   yourself) who are reading the slides online
+
+\subject{Communications}
+% This is only inserted into the PDF information catalog. Can be left
+% out. 
+
+
+
+% If you have a file called "university-logo-filename.xxx", where xxx
+% is a graphic format that can be processed by latex or pdflatex,
+% resp., then you can add a logo as follows:
+
+% \pgfdeclareimage[height=0.5cm]{university-logo}{university-logo-filename}
+% \logo{\pgfuseimage{university-logo}}
+
+
+
+% Delete this, if you do not want the table of contents to pop up at
+% the beginning of each subsection:
+%\AtBeginSubsection[]
+%{
+%  \begin{frame}<beamer>{Outline}
+%    \tableofcontents[currentsection,currentsubsection]
+%  \end{frame}
+%}
+
+
+% If you wish to uncover everything in a step-wise fashion, uncomment
+% the following command: 
+
+%\beamerdefaultoverlayspecification{<+->}
+
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \titlepage
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Outline}
+  \tableofcontents[hideallsubsections]
+  % You might wish to add the option [pausesections]
+\end{frame}
+
+
+% Structuring a talk is a difficult task and the following structure
+% may not be suitable. Here are some rules that apply for this
+% solution: 
+
+% - Exactly two or three sections (other than the summary).
+% - At *most* three subsections per section.
+% - Talk about 30s to 2min per frame. So there should be between about
+%   15 and 30 frames, all told.
+
+% - A conference audience is likely to know very little of what you
+%   are going to talk about. So *simplify*!
+% - In a 20min talk, getting the main ideas across is hard
+%   enough. Leave out details, even if it means being less precise than
+%   you think necessary.
+% - If you omit details that are vital to the proof/implementation,
+%   just say so once. Everybody will be happy with that.
+
+\begin{frame}{About the speaker}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Linux Kernel / bootloader / driver / firmware developmer since 1999
+	\item IT security expert, focus on network protocol security
+	\item Former core developer of Linux packet filter netfilter/iptables
+	\item Board-level Electrical Engineering
+	\item Always looking for interesting protocols (RFID, DECT, GSM)
+	\item OpenPCD, Openmoko, deDECTed.org, OpenBSC, OsmocomBB, OsmoSGSN
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{About sysmocom GmbH}{systems for mobile communications}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item small company, started by two Osmocom developers in Berlin
+	\item provides commercial R\&d and support for professional
+		users of Osmocom software
+	\item develops its own producst like sysmoBTS (inexpensive,
+		small-form-factor, OpenBSC compatible BTS)
+	\item runs a small webshop for Osmocom related hardware like
+		OsmocomBB compatible phones, SIMtrace, etc.
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{Free and Open Source Software}
+
+\subsection{Where is FOSS today}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) is everywhere
+	\item Particularly Servers and all areas of Embedded
+	\item FOSS has fundamentally changed the software industry
+	\item Systems architecture of products becomes more complex
+	\item Nobody can afford to build complex products from scratch
+	\item Everyone builds products on existing FOSS components,
+		particularly the Linux kernel and other OS-level
+		components
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Linux and Free Software (FOSS) everywhere}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=100mm]{linux_netfilter_singapore_entertainment.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item FOSS is not a technology
+	\item FOSS is not a product
+	\item FOSS is not a company
+	\item FOSS is a development methodology and culture
+	\item Only companies with sufficient FOSS experience understand
+		the value of how to interact with the wider FOSS
+		communities
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item FOSS enables participation
+	\item you don't have to work for a specific company in order to
+		do OS development
+	\item nobody has to have any formal relationship with their
+		collaborators, suppliers.
+	\item any {\em nobody} can contribute, even so-called amateurs,
+		hobbyists, students
+	\item it doesn't matter how deep your pockets are
+	\item meritocracy (the better your merits, the more you have a
+		say in the development process)
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{FOSS: Democracy / Equal Access}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item The means of productions (Computers, OS, Compilers) are
+		abundant and inexpensive (for the first world)
+	\item Anyone can create and produce software, all you need is
+		your brain
+	\item No membership required in exclusive forums, industry
+		clubs, consortia
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{FOSS and SDR}
+
+\begin{frame}{Traditional Radio Engineering}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Traditional radio development required electrical
+		engineering in hardware.  You have to
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item know analog / RF electronics
+		\item spin board revisions / prototypes
+		\item actually physically build something
+	\end{itemize}
+	\item Aside from the skills, there is a significant non-HR cost
+		involved for actually doing this development
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{SDR and FOSS}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item SDR transforms radio engineering into the software domain
+	\item In Software, all you need to do R\&D is a bit of general-purpose hardware and your brains
+	\item With inexpensive general-purpose SDR hardware, the same
+		conditions apply to development of radio software!
+	\item Participatory, collaborative, community driven R\&D
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{SDR hardware popular in community SDR projects}
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item When you (the audience) thinks of SDR, it's probably
+		mostly bleeding-edge high-end and high-cost
+	\item At the same time, if you don't have the same high-end
+		requirements, SDR receiver hardware is available cheap
+	\item commoditization effect
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}{The USRP family}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item probably the most-used SDR hardware in the FOSS world
+	\item still the primarly radio used with gnuradio today
+	\item at the low end of the 'professional sdr' price segment
+	\item still, typical configuration costs > 1000 USD
+	\item not everyone is able to spend that (students, hobbyists,
+		especially outside first world countries)
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\subsection{Fun Cube Dongle Pro}
+
+\begin{frame}{Fun Cube Dongle Pro (2010)}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item 64 MHz to 1700 Mhz USB SDR receiver (193 USD)
+	\item limited to 96 kHz I/Q baseband sampling
+	\item great for amateur radio and TETRA, but most other
+communications systems (like GSM introduced in 1992) use wider band-widths
+	\item great progress in terms of size and cost, but much more
+limited than USRP
+	\item Hardware design and firmware sadly are proprietary
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Fun Cube Dongle Pro (2010)}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=110mm]{fcdp_pcb.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{OsmoSDR}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmoSDR (2012)}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item small, low-power / low-cost USB SDR hardware (225 USD)
+	\item higher bandwidth than FunCubeDonglePro (1.2 Ms/s / 14bit)
+	\item much lower cost than USRP, but more expensive than FCDP
+	\item Open Hardware (schematics), software (FPGA, firmware)
+	\item Undergoing another re-spin for 4.2 Ms/s @ 14bit
+\end{itemize}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=70mm]{osmosdr.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\subsection{rtl-sdr}
+
+\begin{frame}{Realtek RTL2832U based DVB-T receivers}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Realtek RTL2832U based DVB-T receivers are cheaply
+		available on the market (USD 20)
+	\item RTL2832U implements ADC, DVB-T demodulator and high-speed
+		USB device
+	\item Normal mode of operation includes full DVB-T receiver
+		inside RTL2832U hardware and only sends MPEG2-TS via USB
+	\item Reverse engineering the USB protocol and replaying certain
+		commands from custom libusb based code was able to trigger the raw
+		sample transmission to the host PC
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{RTL2832U based devices: EzTV 668}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=110mm]{ezcap_top.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{RTL2832U based devices: Hama nano1}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=110mm]{hama_nano1.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{Free Software SDR software}
+
+\begin{frame}{Gnuradio}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Philosophy: Implement SDR not as hand-crafted special-case hand-optimized assembly code in some obscure DSP, but on a general purpose PC
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item with modern x86 systems at multi-GHz clock speeds and with many cores this becomes feasible
+		\item of course way too expensive for a mass-produced product, but very suitable for research, teaching and rapid prototyping
+	\end{itemize}
+	\item Implement various signal processing elements in C++
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item assembly optimized libraries for low-level operations
+		\item provide python bindings for all blocks
+	\end{itemize}
+	\item Python script to define interaction, relation, signal~routing between blocks
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{gnuradio based waveform implementations}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Of course plenty of gr-based implementations for the various analog
+		modulation schemes
+	\item Check out CGRAN (comprehensive gnuradio archive network):
+		Includes 802.11, Zigbee, RDS, DECT, AIS, UHF RFID, ADS-B
+	\item Many other projects out of academia and community, such as
+		OpenLTE (early stage of downlink Rx/Tx)
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Osmocom / osmocom.org}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Osmocom == Open Soruce Mobile Communications
+	\item Classic collaborative, community-driven FOSS project
+	\item Gathers creative people who want to explore this
+		industry-dominated closed mobile communications world
+	\item http://osmocom.org/
+	\begin{itemize}
+		\item non-sdr sub-projects like L2/L3 protocol stacks
+		\item sdr sub-projects for mostly Rx side
+	\end{itemize}
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}{OpenBSC}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item first Osmocom project
+	\item Implements GSM A-bis interface towards BTS
+	\item Supports Siemens, ip.access, Ericsson and Nokia BTS
+	\item can implement only BSC function (osmo-bsc) or a fully
+		autonomous self-contained GSM network (osmo-nitb) that
+		requires no external MSC/VLR/AUC/HLR/EIR
+	\item deployed in > 200 installations world-wide, commercial and
+		research
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomBB}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item Full baseband processor firmware implementation of a mobile phone (MS)
+	\item We re-use existing phone hardware and re-wrote the L1, L2,
+		L3 and higher level logic
+	\item Higher layers reuse code from OpenBSC wherever possible
+	\item Used in a number of universities and other research contexts (including Ericsson Research)
+\end{itemize}
+\begin{figure}[h]
+\centering
+\includegraphics[width=50mm]{c123_pcb.jpg}
+\end{figure}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomTETRA}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item SDR implementation of a TETRA radio-modem (PHY/MAC)
+	\item Rx is fully implemented, Tx only partial
+	\item Can be used for air interface interception
+	\item Accompanied by wireshark dissectors for the TETRA protocol
+		stack
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomGMR}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item ETSI GMR (Geo Mobile Radio) is "GSM for satellites"
+	\item GMR-1 used by Thuraya satellite network
+	\item OsmocomGMR implements SDR based radiomodem + PHY/MAC (Rx)
+	\item Partial wireshark dissectors for the protocol stack
+	\item Reverse engineered implementation of GMR-A5 crypto
+	\item Speech codec is proprietary, still needs reverse engineering
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{OsmocomOP25}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item APCO25 is Professional PMR system used in the US
+	\item Can be compared to TETRA in Europe
+	\item OsmocomOP25 is again SDR receiver + protocol analyzer
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{The OpenBTS Um - SIP bridge}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item OpenBTS is a SDR implementation of GSM Um radio interface
+	\item directly bridges to SIP/RTP, no A-bis/BSC/A/MSC
+	\item suitable for research on air interface, but very different
+		from traditional GSM networks
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{airprobe.org}
+\begin{itemize}
+	\item SDR implementation of Um sniffer
+	\item suitable for receiving GSM Um downlink and uplink
+	\item predates all of the other projects
+	\item more or less abandoned at this point
+\end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}{Thanks}
+Thanks for your attention.  I hope we have time for Q\&A.
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\end{document}
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/hama_nano1.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/hama_nano1.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e1992fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/hama_nano1.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/linux_netfilter_singapore_entertainment.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/linux_netfilter_singapore_entertainment.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..91b839f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/linux_netfilter_singapore_entertainment.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/osmosdr.jpg b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/osmosdr.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..730b579
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/osmosdr.jpg
diff --git a/2012/foss-sdr12europe/outline.txt b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/outline.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ce09c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/2012/foss-sdr12europe/outline.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+* Free and Open Source Software
+ * typically strong in infrastructure and embedded
+ * Linux to be found in many unexpected places today
+ * [various examples]
+* Benefits of FOSS
+ * reduced "software BOM" cost
+ * joint development resources leading to less R&D cost at each
+   individual user (compared to custom implementation)
+ * more eyes reviewing code than any organization has developers in-house
+
+* existing community-driven FOSS projects
+ * gnuradio
+  * do SDR on x86, use C++ blocks connected by python scripts
+  * GUI for visually creating signal processing flow-graphs
+  * strength in research and prototyping of SDR applications
+ * OpenBTS
+ * airprobe
+  * GSM receiver for protocol analysis
+ * Osmocom (TETRA, GMR, SDR, ...)
+
+* inexpensive SDR hardware
+ * USRP family (>= USD 1000)
+ * OsmoSDR (USD 200)
+  * receive-only, 1.4 Ms/s @ 14bit (HW v3: 4.2 Ms/s)
+  * 64 MHz ... 2 GHz
+  * small FPGA + Cortex-M3
+ * rtl-sdr (USD 20)
+  * 64 MHz ... 2 GHz
+  * ?? Ms/s @ 8 bit
+  * raw samples 
+ * UmTRX
+
+* inexpensive "low-end" SDR hardware + FOSS go hand in hand
+ * enable participation in research and development to anyone with sufficient time and interest
+   * beyond traditional telecom industry
+   * beyond top-tier universities with large research grants
+   * removes entry barriers
+   * small businesses can innovate and participate in the market
+
+* accessibility of technology
+ * UFPA / Brazil
+ * ENSPT / Yaounde
+
+* slides from "FOSS in telco / security"
+
+* what can the industry get from this?
+ * ennabling students, researchers and hobbyists to experiment and build skills (whihc are